Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1352687
 
 

Footnotes (147)



 


 



The False Modesty of Department of Revenue v. Davis: Disrupting the Dormant Commerce Clause Through the Traditional Public Function Doctrine


Edward A. Zelinsky


Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

March 3, 2009

Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 255

Abstract:     
In Department of Revenue v. Davis, the United States Supreme Court held that the Kentucky income tax statute and, by extension, other states' similar laws do not discriminate for purposes of the dormant Commerce Clause. By explicitly deferring to established practices and expectations, Davis is, at first blush, the kind of modest, pragmatic decision advocated today by many, including, most prominently, Chief Justice Roberts.

However, on a second look, Davis has broad implications. Indeed, Davis disrupts the Court's preexisting dormant Commerce Clause doctrine by confirming the Roberts Court's use of the "traditional public function" category to immunize government activity from dormant Commerce Clause scrutiny. Over two decades ago, in Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, the Supreme Court rejected for Commerce Clause purposes the "traditional public function" doctrine as unworkable. The Garcia Court's criticism remains persuasive today: There is no principled basis for determining when a government function is old enough to be "traditional" or "public" enough to be public. Every government activity is traditional or becomes so. Given the breadth (indeed, the indeterminacy) of the "traditional public function" category, that category, as affirmed in Davis, encompasses and gives dormant Commerce Clause protection to all governmental activities including tax-based subsidies the Court has previously stricken as impermissibly discriminating under the dormant Commerce Clause. As these previously stricken activities constitute "traditional public functions," Davis logically protects them from dormant Commerce Clause scrutiny.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 70

Keywords: dormant Commerce Clause, state income taxes, discrimination, Davis, traditional public function, Garcia

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 6, 2009 ; Last revised: November 27, 2009

Suggested Citation

Zelinsky, Edward A., The False Modesty of Department of Revenue v. Davis: Disrupting the Dormant Commerce Clause Through the Traditional Public Function Doctrine (March 3, 2009). Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 255. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1352687 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1352687

Contact Information

Edward A. Zelinsky (Contact Author)
Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
212-790-0277 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,017
Downloads: 194
Download Rank: 93,272
Footnotes:  147

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.344 seconds