Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1354048
 
 

Footnotes (80)



 


 



Deciding Not to Decide: Nuremberg and the Ambiguous History of the Tu Quoque Defense


Nicole A. Heise


affiliation not provided to SSRN

January 1, 2009


Abstract:     
Tu Quoque forged its historic legacy during the Nuremberg Tribunal following World War II when German Admiral Karl Doenitz used it as a defense to deflect war crime charges brought against him. By raising the Tu Quoque defense, Doenitz argued that he should be acquitted because other leaders and nations also committed the same crimes. Although many scholars note the Tu Quoque defense's importance, its history has largely been ignored. Using original court documents and personal papers from the Nuremberg Tribunal collection archived at Cornell University, this essay argues that the Tu Quoque defense's history is far from clear and that this ambiguous history clouds its legacy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 6, 2009 ; Last revised: April 6, 2009

Suggested Citation

Heise, Nicole A., Deciding Not to Decide: Nuremberg and the Ambiguous History of the Tu Quoque Defense (January 1, 2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1354048 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1354048

Contact Information

Nicole A. Heise (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 811
Downloads: 128
Download Rank: 125,795
Footnotes:  80

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.750 seconds