|
||||
|
||||
To Heller and Back: Why Many Second Amendment Questions Remain Unanswered After United States v. Hayes
Miguel E. Larios The John Marshall Law School The Federal Lawyer, Vol. 56, No. 8, p. 58, September 2009 Abstract: In District of Columbia v. Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess firearms. More recently, in United States v. Hayes, the Supreme Court upheld a federal statute which criminalizes the possession of firearms by persons previously convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence offenses. This essay argues that the Hayes decision cannot be squared with the individual right to keep and bear arms enunciated in Heller.
Keywords: District of Columbia v. Heller, United States v. Hayes, Supreme Court, Second Amendment, Incorporation, Gun Control, Firearms, Right to Keep and Bear Arms JEL Classifications: I28, K14 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 06, 2009 ; Last revised: September 23, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.141 seconds.