Wikitruth Through Wikiorder
David A. Hoffman
Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law; Cultural Cognition Project at Yale Law School; University of Pennsylvania Law School
Salil K. Mehra
Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law
March 5, 2009
Emory Law Journal, Vol. 59, 2010
Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009-17
How does large-scale social production coordinate individual behavior to produce public goods? Hardin (1968) denied that the creation of public goods absent markets or the State is possible. Benkler (2006), Shirky (2008), Zittrain (2008), and Lessig (2008) recently countered that the needed coordination might emerge though social norms. However, the means to this coordination is under-theorized.
Focusing on Wikipedia, we argue that the site’s dispute resolution process is an important force in promoting the public good it produces, i.e., a large number of relatively accurate public encyclopedia articles. We describe the development and shape of Wikipedia’s existing dispute resolution system. Further, we present a statistical analysis based on coding of over 250 arbitration opinions from Wikipedia’s arbitration system. The data show that Wiki-dispute resolution ignores the content of user disputes, instead focusing on user conduct. Based on fairly formalized arbitration findings, we find a high correlation between the conduct found and the remedies ordered. In effect, the system functions not so much to resolve disputes and make peace between conflicting users, but to weed out problematic users while weeding potentially productive users back in to participate.
Game theorists have modeled large scale social production as a solution to the herder problem/multi-player prisoner’s dilemma. But we demonstrate that the “weeding in” function reflects dynamics more accurately captured in coordination games instead. In this way, dispute resolution can provide a constitutive function for the community.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 47
Keywords: social production, social norms, law, dispute resolution, arbitration, empirical legal studies
JEL Classification: H41, K00, K40, K41
Date posted: March 6, 2009 ; Last revised: August 26, 2009
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.376 seconds