Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1355524
 
 

Footnotes (212)



 


 



Chemical Products and Proportionate Patents Before and After Generics v Lundbeck


Justine Pila


University of Oxford - Faculty of Law

March 1, 2009

King's Law Journal, Vol. 20, 489-526, 2009
Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12/2009

Abstract:     
In Generics Ltd v Lundbeck A/S (2009) UKHL 12, the House of Lords affirmed the validity of a patent for a chemical product - an isolated stereoisomer - supported by a method of producing the product, but protecting the chemical product as such independent of the method by which it was made. In so doing, it appears to have resolved a longstanding tension between granting patents for chemical products and requiring that the scope of monopoly rights equiperate with the disclosure in the specification. It also appears to have rejected the Biogen Inc v Medeva plc (1997) RPC 1 (HL) view of the balance to be struck between inventors and the public, and the commitment expressed by Lord Hoffmann in that case to promoting "research and healthy competition." However, their Lordships' decision is a limited one, applying only to single isolated chemical products. Further, their support for distinguishing categories of claims leaves scope for adopting a different approach with respect to other types of products. In this article I consider one such approach, consistent with the reasoning of the Biogen case, and focused on the purpose of the patent system and the impact of a patent on the relevant art. Such an approach has support in contemporary law, pre-1977 patent jurisprudence, and the intent of the European drafters themselves. Provided its aim is to ensure proportionate protection, any differential treatment across technological fields ought not to constitute discrimination within the meaning of TRIPS or UK patent jurisprudence. Indeed, such treatment may be required precisely to ensure a technologically-neutral patent system.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 18, 2009 ; Last revised: March 17, 2010

Suggested Citation

Pila, Justine, Chemical Products and Proportionate Patents Before and After Generics v Lundbeck (March 1, 2009). King's Law Journal, Vol. 20, 489-526, 2009; Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12/2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1355524

Contact Information

Justine Pila (Contact Author)
University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )
St Cross Building
St Cross Road
Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 3UL
Great Britain
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 948
Downloads: 174
Download Rank: 101,828
Footnotes:  212

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.328 seconds