Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1355678
 
 

Footnotes (8)



 


 



Judicial Resistance to Copyright Law's Inalienable Right to Terminate Transfers


Peter S. Menell


University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

David Nimmer


Irell & Manella LLP


UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 1355678

Abstract:     
For a century, Congress has sought to protect authors and their families by allowing them to grant their copyrights for exploitation and then, decades later, recapture those same rights. After judicial interpretation of the 1909 Act frustrated this intent, Congress spoke unambiguously in 1976: Termination of the grant may be effected notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary . . . . 17 U.S.C. Section 304(c)(5). Yet, in Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. Steinbeck, 537 F.3d 193 (2d Cir. 2008), the Second Circuit eviscerated that clear Congressional command by enabling a grantee to renegotiate the terms of the grant so as to frustrate recapture by the author's family. This ruling follows a Ninth Circuit decision similarly allowing a grantee to go through the charade of rescinding and regranting a copyright license for the express purpose of blocking the author's family members from exercising their statutory termination rights. Milne v. Stephen Slesinger, Inc., 430 F.3d 1036, 1046 (9th Cir. 2005). Notwithstanding the unequivocal meaning of the word any in Section 304(c)(5), explicated unmistakably in the legislative history, these decisions invite grantees to engage in all manner of opportunistic behavior to frustrate Congress' clearly expressed language and intent. In this amicus brief supporting grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court in the Steinbeck case, the authors argue that the Court can restore the intergenerational equity that Congress legislated and remove the cloud now hanging over innumerable copyrighted works.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 10, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Menell, Peter S. and Nimmer, David, Judicial Resistance to Copyright Law's Inalienable Right to Terminate Transfers. UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 1355678. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1355678 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1355678

Contact Information

Peter S. Menell (Contact Author)
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )
215 Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
David Nimmer
Irell & Manella LLP ( email )
1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
Los Angeles, CA 90067
United States
310-277-1010 or (310) 203-7079 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,338
Downloads: 206
Download Rank: 86,645
Footnotes:  8
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.297 seconds