Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1356117
 
 

Footnotes (291)



 


 



The Right to Effective Assistance of Appellate Counsel


Lissa Griffin


Pace University School of Law

1994

West Virginia Law Review, Vol. 97, 1994

Abstract:     
This article closely examines the Supreme Court's decision in Strickland v. Washington, as it applies to effective assistance of trial counsel. Part III analyzes the constitutional origin and current status of the right to effective assistance of counsel on appeal. Part IV discusses the functional differences between trial and appellate counsel, the differences in the two forums, and the different effect that a finding of ineffectiveness of counsel at trial or on appeal has on finality. Part V formulates a standard to govern ineffectiveness of appellate counsel claims that incorporates Strickland's "reasonable competence" standard, but applies that standard differently with respect to appellate counsel. It also rejects Strickland's prejudice requirement.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 11, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Griffin, Lissa, The Right to Effective Assistance of Appellate Counsel (1994). West Virginia Law Review, Vol. 97, 1994. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1356117

Contact Information

Lissa Griffin (Contact Author)
Pace University School of Law ( email )
78 North Broadway
White Plains, NY 10603
United States
914-422-4231 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.pace.edu/page.cfm?doc_id=23170
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 525
Downloads: 45
Footnotes:  291

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.281 seconds