|
||||
|
||||
Internal Governance Mechanisms and Operational Performance: Evidence from Index Mutual FundsJohn C. AdamsUniversity of Texas at Arlington Sattar MansiVirginia Polytechnic Institute & State University Takeshi NishikawaUniversity of Colorado at Denver 2010 Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2010 Abstract: We provide new evidence linking board characteristics and performance. We employ a sample of index funds to isolate the operational component of performance, thereby minimizing investment policy effects in our performance measures. Using manually collected governance data from the mutual fund industry covering the period from 1998 to 2007, we find an inverse relation between board size and fund performance. We also find evidence supporting our hypotheses that organizational form (whether the fund sponsor is publicly or privately held) as an internal governance mechanism plays an important role in determining operational performance. Specifically, we find that board size, the presence of fund sponsor officers, and boards comprised of all independent directors are related to operational performance when the sponsor is publicly held. For privately held firms, board structure is insignificantly related to performance. Overall, the results are consistent with the notion that there may not be a single optimal board structure that is applicable to all funds, attempts to regulate board attributes should be considered with caution, and sponsor level factors are important board structure considerations.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 35 Keywords: Mutual funds, Board structure, Organizational Structure JEL Classification: G34, G32, G20 working papers seriesDate posted: March 10, 2009 ; Last revised: June 19, 2012Suggested Citation |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.312 seconds