|
||||
|
||||
Are Stocks Really Less Volatile in the Long Run?Lubos PastorUniversity of Chicago - Booth School of Business; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Robert F. StambaughUniversity of Pennsylvania - The Wharton School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) March 2009 CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP7199 Abstract: Conventional wisdom views stocks as less volatile over long horizons than over short horizons due to mean reversion induced by return predictability. In contrast, we find stocks are substantially more volatile over long horizons from an investor's perspective. This perspective recognizes that parameters are uncertain, even with two centuries of data, and that observable predictors imperfectly deliver the conditional expected return. We decompose return variance into five components, which include mean reversion and various uncertainties faced by the investor. Although mean reversion makes a strong negative contribution to long-horizon variance, it is more than offset by the other components. Using a predictive system, we estimate annualized 30-year variance to be nearly 1.5 times the 1-year variance.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 48 Keywords: long-run, risk, stock, variance JEL Classification: G11, G23 working papers seriesDate posted: March 11, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 1.109 seconds