Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1356849
 


 



Prelitigation Hardball


Thomas G. Field Jr.


University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center)

Richard F. Kurz


University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center)

March 10, 2009


Abstract:     
In situations where some parties infringe intellectual property (IP) rights only if others do, the former can be thought of as secondary and the latter as primary infringers. This comment considers situations where threats directed to parties such as purchasers of allegedly infringing goods, despite being strategically advantageous to IP owners, can be unfair.

All parties, of course, wish to know of potential liability. Primary infringers obligated to evaluate threats suffer no more than than the expense and annoyance of litigation. But the stakes are raised when threats are aimed at purchasers who lack incentives, for example, to conduct independent inquiries or to credit suppliers' assurances of noninfringement. The potential for unfairness is exacerbated because primary infringers, even when they prevail, are unlikely to recover for lost sales.

This comment, building on an earlier one by the senior author, suggests, for example, that district courts need to better document harm generated by false implications in literally true statements. It also suggests that the Federal Circuit should be more willing to halt practices that may confer the sort of leverage eschewed in eBay.

The paper has been published with few changes in the online Germeshausen Newsletter.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 5

Keywords: patent litigation, rights to petition, commercial speech, secondary infringers

JEL Classification: K10, K20, K41

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 12, 2009 ; Last revised: October 24, 2010

Suggested Citation

Field, Thomas G. and Kurz, Richard F., Prelitigation Hardball (March 10, 2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1356849 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1356849

Contact Information

Thomas G. Field Jr. (Contact Author)
University of New Hampshire School of Law ( email )
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
United States
Richard F. Kurz
University of New Hampshire School of Law ( email )
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 377
Downloads: 37
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.266 seconds