|
||||
|
||||
Two Refusals of Royal Assent in Victoria
Greg Taylor Monash University - Faculty of Law Sydney Law Review, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 85-130, 2007 Monash University Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2007/39 Abstract: The Governor of Victoria, having objected to two Bills passed by Parliament in the 1850s, received advice from the colonial government to refuse assent to them. These are the only occasions on which the Royal assent has been refused locally in Victoria, and one of the very few such incidents in Australian history. One of the Bills would have implied a statement that UK law of the day was incompatible with religious liberty, and thus raised sectarian and Imperial complications; the other was a constitutional amendment passed without following the prescribed procedure. This article reconstructs the events and the public reaction, as far as possible; considers whether the Governor acted rightly; and concludes that the Crown should refuse assent if advised to do so by its Ministers, despite occasional views to the contrary.
Keywords: Refusal, Royal Assent, Victoria, Parliament JEL Classifications: K0, K00, K29, K40, K49 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 24, 2009 ; Last revised: April 24, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.125 seconds.