Citations (1)


Footnotes (509)



Green Jobs Myths

Andrew P. Morriss

Texas A&M School of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center; George Mason University - Mercatus Center

William T. Bogart

York College of Pennsylvania

Andrew Dorchak

Case Western Reserve University Law Library

Roger E. Meiners

University of Texas at Arlington

March 12, 2009

U Illinois Law & Economics Research Paper No. LE09-001
Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-15

A rapidly growing literature promises that a massive program of government mandates, subsidies, and forced technological interventions will reward the nation with an economy brimming with green jobs. Not only will these jobs improve the environment, but they will be high paying, interesting, and provide collective rights. This literature is built on mythologies about economics, forecasting, and technology.

Myth: Everyone understands what a green job is.

Reality: No standard definition of a green job exists.

Myth: Creating green jobs will boost productive employment.

Reality: Green jobs estimates include huge numbers of clerical, bureaucratic, and administrative positions that do not produce goods and services for consumption.

Myth: Green jobs forecasts are reliable.

Reality: The green jobs studies made estimates using poor economic models based on dubious assumptions.

Myth: Green jobs promote employment growth.

Reality: By promoting more jobs instead of more productivity, the green jobs described in the literature encourage low-paying jobs in less desirable conditions. Economic growth cannot be ordered by Congress or by the United Nations. Government interference - such as restricting successful technologies in favor of speculative technologies favored by special interests - will generate stagnation.

Myth: The world economy can be remade by reducing trade and relying on local production and reduced consumption without dramatically decreasing our standard of living.

Reality: History shows that nations cannot produce everything their citizens need or desire. People and firms have talents that allow specialization that make goods and services ever more efficient and lower-cost, thereby enriching society.

Myth: Government mandates are a substitute for free markets.

Reality: Companies react more swiftly and efficiently to the demands of their customers and markets, than to cumbersome government mandates.

Myth: Imposing technological progress by regulation is desirable.

Reality: Some technologies preferred by the green jobs studies are not capable of efficiently reaching the scale necessary to meet today's demands and could be counterproductive to environmental quality.

In this Article, we survey the green jobs literature, analyze its assumptions, and show how the special interest groups promoting the idea of green jobs have embedded dubious assumptions and techniques within their analyses. Before undertaking efforts to restructure and possibly impoverish our society, careful analysis and informed public debate about these assumptions and prescriptions are necessary.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 97

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 12, 2009 ; Last revised: June 11, 2014

Suggested Citation

Morriss, Andrew P. and Bogart, William T. and Dorchak, Andrew and Meiners, Roger E., Green Jobs Myths (March 12, 2009). U Illinois Law & Economics Research Paper No. LE09-001; Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1358423 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1358423

Contact Information

Andrew P. Morriss (Contact Author)
Texas A&M School of Law ( email )
1515 Commerce Street
Fort Worth, TX 76133
United States
PERC - Property and Environment Research Center ( email )
2048 Analysis Drive
Suite A
Bozeman, MT 59718
United States
George Mason University - Mercatus Center ( email )
3434 Washington Blvd., 4th Floor
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
William T. Bogart
York College of Pennsylvania ( email )
York, PA 17405-7199
United States
717-815-1231 (Phone)
Andrew Dorchak
Case Western Reserve University Law Library ( email )
11075 East Boulevard
Cleveland, OH 44106
United States
Roger E. Meiners
University of Texas at Arlington ( email )
415 S West St Apt no 205
Arlington, TX 76013
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 20,764
Downloads: 2,318
Download Rank: 3,407
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  509
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.485 seconds