Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1358460
 
 

Citations (4)



 


 



Fence Posts or Sign Posts: Rethinking Patent Claim Construction


Dan L. Burk


University of California, Irvine School of Law

Mark A. Lemley


Stanford Law School

March 12, 2009

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 157, p. 1743, 2009
UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2009-10
Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1358460

Abstract:     
Patent law is bogged down in the minutia of claims construction. Claim construction is central to every patent dispute, but it has not provided the hoped-for certainty or notice to competitors. Quite the contrary: disputes about the importance of inventions and the scope of patents have been replaced by labyrinthine wrangling over words written by lawyers. The flaws of claim construction result largely from the problems attending "peripheral claims," that is, claims that purport to set the outermost boundaries of patent rights. In this paper, we argue that the way for the patent system to move ahead may be by looking behind, to the practice of "central claiming" that was prevalent before 1870, and which was used in many countries through the late twentieth century. Rather than relying on the illusion of peripheral "fence posts," patent law may do better to once again look to stability of central "sign posts." We examine the failure of peripheral claiming, the benefits of central claiming, and several hybrid measures that might be adopted, either in the process of moving from fence-posting to sign-posting, or as improvements over the current system that still stop short of fully adopting central claiming.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 71

Keywords: patents, intellectual property, claim construction, peripheral claiming, central claiming, Markman

JEL Classification: K19, K29, O31, O32, O34

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 13, 2009 ; Last revised: February 6, 2011

Suggested Citation

Burk, Dan L. and Lemley, Mark A., Fence Posts or Sign Posts: Rethinking Patent Claim Construction (March 12, 2009). University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 157, p. 1743, 2009; UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2009-10; Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1358460. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1358460

Contact Information

Dan L. Burk
University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )
4500 Berkeley Place
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States
949-824-9325 (Phone)
Mark A. Lemley (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,814
Downloads: 577
Download Rank: 24,879
Citations:  4
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.407 seconds