Informational Standing: Akins and Beyond

Cass R. Sunstein

Harvard Law School

In the University of Pennsylvania Law Review

The following is the author's description of his paper and not the actual abstract:

This Article discusses informational regulation and informational standing. It outlines the rise of informational regulation as an alternative to government command-and-control and offers a discussion of why and when information might be a good regulatory tool. It also shows how the grant of legal rights to information raises a host of novel standing issues, testing the notions of injury in fact, redressability, generalized grievances, and "arguably within the zone" of statutorily protected interests. Based on a detailed analysis of Federal Election Commission v. Akins, and lower court cases, it develops guidelines for standing in informational cases, recognizing that Congress can grant informational standing when it chooses, but that the redressability and "zone" limitations call for denials of standing in some contexts.

Not Available For Download

Date posted: October 19, 1998  

Suggested Citation

Sunstein, Cass R., Informational Standing: Akins and Beyond. In the University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=135854

Contact Information

Cass R. Sunstein (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts Ave
Areeda Hall 225
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-496-2291 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 763

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.297 seconds