|
||||
|
||||
When Should States Challenge Mergers: A Proposed Federal/State BalanceRobert H. LandeUniversity of Baltimore - School of Law 1990 New York Law School Law Review, Vol. 35, No. 4, 1990 Abstract: This article critically analyzes the current system of United States merger enforcement, under which both federal and State antitrust enforcers scrutinizes and potentially can challenge any merger that affects interstate commerce. This article develops and proposes an alternative, a voluntary division of responsibility patterned after the European Union's approach. Under this alternative federal enforcers normally would defer to State enforcers for certain specified mergers, and State enforcers normally would defer to federal enforcers for other specified mergers.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 49 Keywords: merger, antitrust harmonization, state antitrust, state merger enforcement, European Union merger enforcement, federal/state cooperation JEL Classification: K21, K19, K39 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 30, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.360 seconds