When Should States Challenge Mergers: A Proposed Federal/State Balance
Robert H. Lande
University of Baltimore - School of Law
New York Law School Law Review, Vol. 35, No. 4, 1990
This article critically analyzes the current system of United States merger enforcement, under which both federal and State antitrust enforcers scrutinizes and potentially can challenge any merger that affects interstate commerce. This article develops and proposes an alternative, a voluntary division of responsibility patterned after the European Union's approach. Under this alternative federal enforcers normally would defer to State enforcers for certain specified mergers, and State enforcers normally would defer to federal enforcers for other specified mergers.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 49
Keywords: merger, antitrust harmonization, state antitrust, state merger enforcement, European Union merger enforcement, federal/state cooperation
JEL Classification: K21, K19, K39Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 30, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.438 seconds