Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1359126
 


 



Quality of Care and Market Failure Defenses in Antitrust Health Care Litigation


Thomas L. Greaney


Saint Louis University School of Law

1989

Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1989

Abstract:     
This article considers quality-based justifications for antitrust challenges to collaboration among health care professionals. It first examines doctrinal developments resisting such justifications and, with a skeptical eye, analyzes attempts to interject quality of care and worthy motive defenses into antitrust appraisals of horizontal restraints of trade. Next the article assesses the economic basis and the risks and benefits of a market failure defense that would allow some quality-enhancing restraints of trade to escape antitrust challenge. Its principle recommendation is that courts recognize a narrow, market failure defense subject to several limiting principles to cabin its reach. The article concludes by applying its suggested approach to the market failure defense in cases involving horizontal conspiracies in which defendants justified certain actions by invoking their salutary effects on quality of care.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 61

Keywords: antitrust, Sherman Act, collusion, market failure, health care, physicians, market failure defense, quality of care

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 2, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Greaney, Thomas L., Quality of Care and Market Failure Defenses in Antitrust Health Care Litigation (1989). Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1989. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1359126

Contact Information

Thomas L. Greaney (Contact Author)
Saint Louis University School of Law ( email )
100 N. Tucker Blvd.
St. Louis, MO 63108
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 496
Downloads: 67
Download Rank: 208,312

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.281 seconds