Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1359284
 


 



Justice Blackstone's Common Law Orthodoxy


Emily Kadens


Northwestern University School of Law

March 13, 2009

Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 103, 2009

Abstract:     
Although William Blackstone served longer as a judge on the English Court of Common Pleas than he had as the inaugural Vinerian Professor of English law at Oxford, his post-professorial legal life has been almost entirely ignored by scholars. Only one brief article, written almost fifty years ago and focused narrowly on legal doctrine, has offered any insight into Blackstone as a judge. And yet the subject is of interest for two reasons. First, Blackstone was the first law professor to become a judge on an English common law court. Second, his judicial opinions provide an alternative, and arguably a more accurate, path into his legal thought. The lectures that became the Commentaries on the Laws of England were written when he was barely thirty years old and had spent fewer than seven unsuccessful years at the bar. By contrast, his judicial opinions are the work of a mature legal thinker. It is not possible to accurately assess how well the jurisprudence expressed in the Commentaries reflects his true legal thought without also studying his opinions and his other available practical legal writing. This article argues that Blackstone's opinions show him to have been a strong and consistent adherent to a basic view of law that all English lawyers shared and that Blackstone advocated in the Commentaries. This view, which is here called the common law orthodoxy, was a set of principles about how law was made and the role of judges in finding it. However, where most lawyers and judges, while taking the orthodoxy as a baseline, were willing to deviate from it as necessary, Blackstone was not. This insistence on principles arguably derived at least in part from his academic habit of seeing the law as a set of abstract rules. Having spent more time and achieved greater success as a teacher than he did as a practitioner, he never came to fully appreciate the practical realities of how the common law worked in the courtroom. Consequently, the man whose work is so admired in American law and who is so often cited as representing the state of the law at the time of the Founders, did not himself have a perfect understanding of the legal mind of his age.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 54

Keywords: legal history, Blackstone, jurisprudence

JEL Classification: Z00

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 14, 2009 ; Last revised: July 19, 2010

Suggested Citation

Kadens, Emily, Justice Blackstone's Common Law Orthodoxy (March 13, 2009). Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 103, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1359284

Contact Information

Emily Kadens (Contact Author)
Northwestern University School of Law ( email )
600 North Lake Shore Drive
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60601
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,319
Downloads: 207
Download Rank: 88,163

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.375 seconds