Rambus v. F.T.C. in the Context of Standard-Setting Organizations, Antitrust, and the Patent Hold-Up Problem
Joel M. Wallace
Berkeley Center for Law & Technology
March 13, 2009
Berkley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 24, p. 661, 2009
This article examines the patent hold-up problem through the lens of recent litigation involving alleged abuses within standard-setting organizations (SSOs). In Rambus v. Federal Trade Commission, a case addressing antitrust liability for failing to disclose relevant patents to an SSO, the D.C. Circuit held that an SSO member should not face liability unless there is affirmative proof that the SSO would have certainly chosen another standard absent deception. This article argues that the D.C. Circuit's analysis was incompatible with its prior en banc ruling in United States v. Microsoft. Next, this article explores measures SSOs may take to avoid the patent hold-up problem. Finally, this article examines the possibility of expanding the use of equitable defenses by defendants sued by firms that attempt to engage in hold-up.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44
Keywords: intellectual property, joel wallace, patent, hold-up, antitrust, rambus, broadcom, qualcomm, ftc, f.t.c., standardsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 19, 2009 ; Last revised: March 18, 2010
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 2.031 seconds