Abstract

 
 

References (27)



 


 



Who Wins and Who Loses Among Individual Investors?


Kingsley Y. L. Fong


University of New South Wales - School of Banking and Finance; Financial Research Network (FIRN)

David R. Gallagher


Centre for International Finance and Regulation; The University of New South Wales - Australian School of Business; Macquarie Graduate School of Management

Adrian D. Lee


University of Technology, Sydney - Finance Discipline Group; Financial Research Network (FIRN)

March 17, 2009


Abstract:     
We study the trade performance of three investor clienteles: investors that use discount retail brokers, full service retail brokers and institutional brokers. Our data have some advantages over those used in other studies in that it covers trade and order data across an entire developed market dominated by institutional investors over a long sample period. We find that individual investors incur significant losses to institutional investors from intraday trading, whereas their net trades earn a positive return over the first month. While individuals trading through both full service and discount brokers lose from intraday trading, only full service broker trades profit over longer holding periods. Full service broker clients' limit order trades earn positive returns over 10 to 25 days, and their market order trades earn positive profit over horizons from 1 to 254 days. They fit the profile of individual investors in Kaniel, Saar and Titman (2008) and the behavior of informed traders in Bloomfield, O'Hara and Saar (2005). The returns discount broker clients earn on limit order trades are negative while those on market orders are not different from zero. Furthermore, discount broker client losses reduce over the course of a trading day, and during low volatility periods. Discount broker clients appear uninformed and suffer from better informed traders picking off their limit orders. Their consistent losses echo the finding in Barber, Lee, Liu and Odean (2009). Our counter party analysis and other robustness tests also support the above interpretation. Overall, our evidence from individual investors trading in stock markets is consistent with a Grossman and Stiglitz (1980) equilibrium in that full service brokers provide more valuable services to their clients than discount brokers and charge a higher fee. This is in contrast to Bergstresser, Chalmers and Tufano (2007) findings in the mutual fund industry. We conclude that individual investors are heterogeneous, and their trading performance reflects the information and brokerage services that they receive.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

Keywords: Individual investors, individual investor trade performance, market efficiency

JEL Classification: G14

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 22, 2009 ; Last revised: November 8, 2012

Suggested Citation

Fong, Kingsley Y. L., Gallagher, David R. and Lee, Adrian D., Who Wins and Who Loses Among Individual Investors? (March 17, 2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1364978 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1364978

Contact Information

Kingsley Y. L. Fong (Contact Author)
University of New South Wales - School of Banking and Finance ( email )
Sydney, NSW 2052
Australia
Financial Research Network (FIRN)
C/- University of Queensland Business School
St Lucia, 4071 Brisbane
Queensland
Australia
HOME PAGE: http://www.firn.org.au

David R. Gallagher
Centre for International Finance and Regulation ( email )
Level 7, UNSW CBD Campus
1 O'Connell Street
Sydney, NSW 2000
Australia
HOME PAGE: http://www.cifr.edu.au
The University of New South Wales - Australian School of Business ( email )
Sydney, NSW 2052
Australia
HOME PAGE: http://www.cifr.edu.au

Macquarie Graduate School of Management ( email )
MGSM
99 Talavera Road
North Ryde, NSW 2109
Australia
HOME PAGE: http://www.mgsm.edu.au
Adrian D. Lee
University of Technology, Sydney - Finance Discipline Group ( email )
PO Box 123
UTS Haymarket Campus
Broadway, NSW 2007
Australia
95147765 (Phone)
95147722 (Fax)
Financial Research Network (FIRN)
C/- University of Queensland Business School
St Lucia, 4071 Brisbane
Queensland
Australia
HOME PAGE: http://www.firn.org.au

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 764
Downloads: 197
Download Rank: 70,034
References:  27

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.485 seconds