Footnotes (139)



Judicial Reporting of Lawyer Misconduct

Arthur F. Greenbaum

Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law

March 19, 2009

University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Vol. 77, 2009

It has long been recognized that judges can and should play a central role in the lawyer disciplinary process by reporting substantial lawyer misconduct they observe to disciplinary authorities. Despite the nearly 20-year existence of a mandatory reporting rule in such instances, the conventional wisdom suggests that the rule often is not followed. While the 2007 revision of the ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct provided a golden opportunity to address this problem, the process resulted in little more than a hortatory reaffirmation of the basic principle. There is a better path.

In this essay, I thoroughly analyze the costs and benefits of mandatory judicial reporting, the outcome of which reaffirms the importance of having a rule that works, set forth the case for why we can realistically expect judges, more so than lawyers, to carry out that duty, and provide concrete steps to achieve that promise.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: legal ethics, professional responsibility, judges

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 22, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Greenbaum, Arthur F., Judicial Reporting of Lawyer Misconduct (March 19, 2009). University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Vol. 77, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1365359

Contact Information

Arthur Franklin Greenbaum (Contact Author)
Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law ( email )
55 W. 12th Ave.
Columbus, OH 43210
United States
614-292-4160 (Phone)
614-688-4202 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,067
Downloads: 122
Download Rank: 172,281
Footnotes:  139

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.204 seconds