Judicial Reporting of Lawyer Misconduct
Arthur F. Greenbaum
Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law
March 19, 2009
University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Vol. 77, 2009
It has long been recognized that judges can and should play a central role in the lawyer disciplinary process by reporting substantial lawyer misconduct they observe to disciplinary authorities. Despite the nearly 20-year existence of a mandatory reporting rule in such instances, the conventional wisdom suggests that the rule often is not followed. While the 2007 revision of the ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct provided a golden opportunity to address this problem, the process resulted in little more than a hortatory reaffirmation of the basic principle. There is a better path.
In this essay, I thoroughly analyze the costs and benefits of mandatory judicial reporting, the outcome of which reaffirms the importance of having a rule that works, set forth the case for why we can realistically expect judges, more so than lawyers, to carry out that duty, and provide concrete steps to achieve that promise.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 32
Keywords: legal ethics, professional responsibility, judges
Date posted: March 22, 2009
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.204 seconds