Abstract

 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (320)



 


 



What Virtual Worlds Can Do for Property Law


Juliet M. Moringiello


Widener University - School of Law

March 21, 2009

Florida Law Review, Vol. 62, p.159, 2010
Widener Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-08

Abstract:     
This is an article about how disputes over virtual world items, such as virtual money, Second Life islands, and even sex beds, can inform property law generally. Rights in these virtual world items, like rights in software and many other intangible assets, are transferred by standard-form agreements that are often designated as licenses. For many readers, virtual worlds need no definition; it has been hard to read a major newspaper in the past several years without encountering an article about virtual worlds. In the past several years, Second Life and other virtual worlds were featured in numerous articles in major American newspapers, including the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal.

Virtual worlds have captured the attention of legal and other scholars. The legal literature tends to focus on the application of real world laws to the virtual environment. Some have discussed how our property laws should apply in virtual worlds; others have questioned whether virtual worlds need their own governance institutions. In this article, I will take another approach. Rather than asking whether real world laws can or should apply to virtual worlds, I will discuss the ways in which the study of virtual worlds can contribute to real world law. Specifically, I will explain what the study of virtual world assets can do for property law.

In this paper, I argue that virtual world assets are significant because they graphically illustrate the different rights that persons can hold in an intangible asset. Once we see that intangible assets encompass the very same rights that are embodied in tangible assets, we can understand that the law should not permit the unfettered customization of property rights in intangible assets by standard form agreements, just as the law does not permit the unlimited customization of property rights in tangible assets and real property. My thesis is that a study of virtual world assets can help us understand why the numerus clausus principle should be more rigorously applied to rights in intangible assets and that the numerus clausus can, in turn, assist us interpreting the standard-form agreements that convey rights in these assets.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Keywords: clickwrap, virtual worlds, virtual property, numerus clausus

JEL Classification: K11, K12

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 22, 2009 ; Last revised: February 12, 2010

Suggested Citation

Moringiello, Juliet M., What Virtual Worlds Can Do for Property Law (March 21, 2009). Florida Law Review, Vol. 62, p.159, 2010; Widener Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-08. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1366450

Contact Information

Juliet M. Moringiello (Contact Author)
Widener University - School of Law ( email )
3800 Vartan Way
P.O. Box 69382
Harrisburg, PA 17106
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,561
Downloads: 292
Download Rank: 49,642
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  320

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.391 seconds