Red Herring or the Death of the Exclusionary Rule?
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Trial Magazine, April 2009
Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 129
This article discusses Herring v. United States in which the Court held, 5-4, that evidence found after the defendant was arrested due to faulty information provided by a police from another county would not be excluded. The holding was narrow: "When police mistakes leading to an unlawful search are the result of isolated negligence attenuated from the search, rather than systemic error or reckless disregard of constitutional requirements, the exclusionary rule should not apply." However, the opinion contains much language suggesting that the Court is prepared to abandon the rule, which has been the foundation of criminal procedure since 1961. This article discusses just what Herring held, and what its implications may be.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 6
Keywords: Criminal Procedure, Fourth Amendment, Exclusionary RuleAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 26, 2009 ; Last revised: July 1, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.406 seconds