Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1367624
 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Copyright Infringement and Harmless Speech


Christina Bohannan


University of Iowa - College of Law

May 29, 2010

Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 61, No. 4, 2010
U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-15

Abstract:     
Copyright law is a glaring and unjustified exception to the rule that the government may not prohibit speech without a showing that it causes harm. While the First Amendment sometimes protects even harmful speech, it virtually never allows the prohibition of harmless speech. Yet, while other speech-burdening laws, such as defamation and right of publicity laws, require demonstrable evidence that the defendant’s speech causes actual harm, copyright law does not make harm a requirement of infringement. Although copyright law considers harm to the market for the copyrighted work as a factor in fair use analysis, harm is not always required and is so poorly defined that the concept has become circular. Moreover, the defendant ordinarily bears the burden of proof to show the absence of harm. As a result, courts often find liability for infringement (and therefore burden speech) where harm is nonexistent or purely speculative.

Potential explanations for copyright’s anomalous treatment are unpersuasive. Copying involves speech as well as conduct, and the fact that copyrights are in some sense property does not come close to justifying its aberrant treatment. Moreover, copyright’s role in encouraging creative expression does not obviate First Amendment concerns. Drawing from cases holding that speech restrictions must be justified by an important or compelling governmental interest, this Article argues that the First Amendment requires real harm to the copyright holder’s incentives in order to impose liability. It also explores the types of harm that might arise in copyright infringement cases. It concludes that demonstrable harm of market substitution is cognizable under First Amendment principles. On the other hand, the First Amendment generally would not permit recognition of harm to the reputation of copyrighted works, or, except in cases of unpublished works, harm to an author or copyright holder’s privacy, right not to speak, or right not to associate.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 78

Keywords: Copyright, harm, fair use, first amendment, speech

JEL Classification: K3, Z10

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 28, 2009 ; Last revised: May 28, 2010

Suggested Citation

Bohannan, Christina, Copyright Infringement and Harmless Speech (May 29, 2010). Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 61, No. 4, 2010; U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1367624 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1367624

Contact Information

Christina Bohannan (Contact Author)
University of Iowa - College of Law ( email )
Melrose and Byington
Iowa City, IA 52242
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,417
Downloads: 324
Download Rank: 54,227
Citations:  2
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds