|
||||
|
||||
When is a Mutual Fund Director Independent? The Unexplored Role of Professional Relationships Under Section 2(A)(19) of the Investment Company ActLarry D. BarnettWidener University - School of Law March 24, 2009 DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal, Vol 4, 2006 Abstract: An investment company that must register with the Securities and Exchange Commission is required by the Investment Company Act to have a specified percentage or number of directors who are not "interested" in the company. To be not interested (i.e., to be independent), a director of an investment company is barred by section 2(a)(19) of the Act from inter alia having had, during the last two completed fiscal years of the company, a material business relationship or a material professional relationship with specified parties. The Commission, in interpreting section 2(a)(19), has not clearly distinguished the two types of relationships and has not focused on professional relationships apart from business relationships. The article contends that this is contrary to the intent of Congress. Accordingly, the article (i) identifies both the elements of a business relationship and the elements of a professional relationship; and (ii) reviews three no-action letters in each of which the Commission staff could have found that a proposed arrangement would have created a professional relationship for an investment company director.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34 Keywords: mutual funds, investment companies, directors, independent directors, independence, relationships JEL Classification: K22, K23 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 25, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.375 seconds