Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1367877
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (385)



 


 



The Supreme Court as 'Prime Percolator': A Prescription for Appellate Review of Questions in Patent Law


John M. Golden


The University of Texas at Austin - School of Law

March 24, 2009

UCLA Law Review, Vol. 56, No. 3, 2009
U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 150

Abstract:     
Generally speaking, the Supreme Court of the United States is a tribunal with the final say on what the law is. But the desirability of the Supreme Court's acting as final law sayer is questionable in patent law, where the Court primarily reviews the work of the Federal Circuit, a comparatively expert body having virtually exclusive jurisdiction over initial appeals. Nonetheless, in recent years, the Supreme Court has spoken repeatedly and forcefully on questions of substantive patent law. I argue that such Supreme Court activity is best justified and conceived not as directed toward final law saying, but instead as involving limited interventions to stimulate new or renewed judicial examination of important legal questions. Centralized appellate review in the Federal Circuit makes patent law unusually susceptible to doctrinal ossification. By engaging in periodic merits review of patent law doctrines that the Federal Circuit may have locked into place either too quickly or for too long, the Supreme Court can help initiate escapes from suboptimal legal equilibria. But the Court's competence is limited. Consequently, when intervening in substantive patent law, the Court should generally leave primary responsibility for developing precise legal formulas to the Patent and Trademark Office, district courts, and the Federal Circuit.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 69

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 28, 2009 ; Last revised: April 7, 2010

Suggested Citation

Golden, John M., The Supreme Court as 'Prime Percolator': A Prescription for Appellate Review of Questions in Patent Law (March 24, 2009). UCLA Law Review, Vol. 56, No. 3, 2009; U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 150. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1367877

Contact Information

John M. Golden (Contact Author)
The University of Texas at Austin - School of Law ( email )
School of Law
727 East Dean Keeton Street
Austin, TX 78705
United States
(512) 232-1469 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 797
Downloads: 97
Download Rank: 161,224
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  385

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.344 seconds