Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1367909
 
 

Footnotes (53)



 


 



The Sky Has Not Yet Fallen on Punitive Damages in Admiralty


John Paul Jones


University of Richmond School of Law

March 24, 2009

Tulane Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
Contrary to much of what has been said about the decision of the United States Supreme Court last term in Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, it hardly put an end to the discretion of American judges to make awards of punitive damages in cases within admiralty jurisdiction. Rather, it confirmed judicial authority to make such awards in the absence of legislative direction, rejected the view that the Clean Air Act signals any intent of Congress to foreclose them in cases in which that statute is implicated, and sets for them a cap, but only for an uncommon category of cases.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 10

Keywords: admiralty, maritime, punitive, Exxon Valdez, Apex Marine, oil spill, Robins Dry Dock

JEL Classification: K13, K32, K41, K42, L92

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 1, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Jones, John Paul, The Sky Has Not Yet Fallen on Punitive Damages in Admiralty (March 24, 2009). Tulane Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1367909

Contact Information

John Paul Jones (Contact Author)
University of Richmond School of Law ( email )
28 Westhampton Way
Richmond, VA 23173
United States
804-289-8211 (Phone)
804-662-5085 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://law.richmond.edu/faculty/jones.php
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 573
Downloads: 60
Download Rank: 205,027
Footnotes:  53
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.547 seconds