Footnotes (55)



5 U.S.C.§ 553: Patent Elephants in Process Mouseholes

Thomas G. Field Jr.

University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center)

March 28, 2009

Pierce Law Review, Vol. 8, p. 82, 2009

Reversing Tafas v. Dudas, 541 F.Supp.2d 805 (E.D.Va. 2008), a panel of the Federal Circuit in Tafas v. Doll, 2009 WL 723353 (Fed. Cir. 2009), finds challenged rules within the rulemaking authority of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). It therfore remands for consideration of a host of issues that the district court had not needed to reach.

This comment focuses on one question to be considered on remand: whether the PTO must use notice and comment rule making to promulgate procedural rules. It argues that the statute does not warrant imposing such an unusual duty. Moreover, it argues that the issue need not be addressed insofar as rules in question were in fact promulgated after notice and extensive (if largely unfavorable) public comment.

The comment also notes that the opinion was vacated by the Federal Circuit en banc in Tafas v. Kappos.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: patent and trademark office, PTO, administrative process, rulemaking authority

JEL Classification: K20, K23

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: April 1, 2009 ; Last revised: January 9, 2015

Suggested Citation

Field, Thomas G., 5 U.S.C.§ 553: Patent Elephants in Process Mouseholes (March 28, 2009). Pierce Law Review, Vol. 8, p. 82, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1369682

Contact Information

Thomas G. Field Jr. (Contact Author)
University of New Hampshire School of Law ( email )
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 355
Downloads: 38
Footnotes:  55
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.359 seconds