|
||||
|
||||
Loyalty/Requirement Rebates and the Antitrust Modernization Commission: What is the Appropriate Liability Standard?Nicholas EconomidesNew York University - Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics June 29, 2009 NET Institute Working Paper No. #09-02 NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 09-15 Antitrust Bulletin, 2009 Abstract: I discuss and assess the various standards for establishing liability for loyalty discounts offered under a requirement contract. I find that the standard proposed by the Antitrust Modernization Commission is likely to result in many cases of violation that are not caught. The safe harbor defined by the AMC would permit activity that is in fact anticompetitive. I propose instead a structured rule of reason test that relies on consumers' surplus comparisons under the loyalty/requirement practice and the but-for world. The proposed standard does not have a safe harbor based on a price/cost comparison because such comparisons do not generally correspond to consumers' surplus comparisons.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 29 Keywords: bundling, loyalty discounts, requirement contracts, monopolization, antitrust, monopoly JEL Classification: K21, D42, D43 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 1, 2009 ; Last revised: June 30, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.359 seconds