Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1371080
 
 

Footnotes (72)



 


 



Judicial Activism and Fourteenth Amendment Privacy Claims: The Allure of Originalism and the Unappreciated Promise of Constrained Nonoriginalism


Daniel O. Conkle


Indiana University Maurer School of Law

2009

14 Nexus: A Journal of Opinion 31 (2009)
Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 131

Abstract:     
Among other meanings, "judicial activism" can be defined as judicial decisionmaking that frustrates majoritarian self-government and that is unconstrained by law. So understood, judicial activism is presumptively problematic, because it frustrates customary democratic and judicial norms.

In this essay, I address originalist and nonoriginalist responses to the presumptive problem of judicial activism in the context of Fourteenth Amendment privacy claims, including claims relating to abortion, sexual conduct, and same-sex marriage. I argue that originalism is an overrated solution, largely because current understandings of originalism, despite claims to the contrary, do not provide standards of decision that are sufficiently clear to control the Supreme Court's discretion. Conversely, some forms of nonoriginalist interpretation - in particular, those that rely on objective determinations of traditional or contemporary American societal values - may constrain the Court in meaningful ways. Relatedly, originalism may frustrate majoritarian self-government no less than these competing nonoriginalist methodologies, which, indeed, can be seen as relatively inoffensive to majoritarian values. If I am correct, critics of judicial activism might wish to reconsider their typical stance, that of embracing originalism and rejecting nonoriginalism as categorically illegitimate.

This essay is part of a symposium addressing "Judicial Activism: Same-Sex Marriage and the Aftermath of Proposition 8."

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: Constitutional Law, Constitutional Interpretation, Constitutional Theory, Jurisprudence, Substantive Due Process, Unenumerated Rights, Privacy, Liberty, Abortion, Sexuality, Same-Sex Marriage

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K19, K30, K39

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 1, 2009 ; Last revised: July 2, 2013

Suggested Citation

Conkle, Daniel O., Judicial Activism and Fourteenth Amendment Privacy Claims: The Allure of Originalism and the Unappreciated Promise of Constrained Nonoriginalism (2009). 14 Nexus: A Journal of Opinion 31 (2009); Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 131. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1371080

Contact Information

Daniel O. Conkle (Contact Author)
Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )
211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States
(812) 855-4331 (Phone)
(812) 855-0555 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 645
Downloads: 117
Download Rank: 142,263
Footnotes:  72

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.297 seconds