Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1373223
 
 

Footnotes (256)



 


 



Ineffective Assistance at Sentencing


Carissa Byrne Hessick


University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law

April 4, 2009

50 Boston College Law Review 1069 (2009)

Abstract:     
The legal standards for reviewing claims of ineffective assistance at sentencing are underdeveloped. In other contexts, defendants seeking to prove ineffective assistance must demonstrate that counsel's performance fell below appropriate professional standards and that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's deficient performance, the result of the proceeding would have been different. The doctrinal uncertainty whether that standard applies to sentencing proceedings in non-capital cases, coupled with worries that ineffective assistance at sentencing claims will result in a flood of litigation, has led some courts to require defendants to satisfy stricter prejudice standards in discretionary non-capital sentencing regimes. This Article analyzes the ineffective assistance jurisprudence and concludes that the sufficiency of counsel's performance is largely evaluated against a backdrop of relevant substantive law. The substantive law of non-capital sentencing is not well-developed, which may explain the underdeveloped state of ineffective assistance at sentencing standards. Drawing on several recent ineffective assistance cases in the death penalty context, this Article identifies legal principles and practices that may assist in making the legal assessments necessary to analyze ineffective assistance at sentencing claims. These principles and practices may provide a sufficient legal framework to render unnecessary the crude manipulation of the prejudice showing that some courts have employed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 54

Keywords: sentencing, sixth amendment, ineffective assistance of counsel

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 5, 2009 ; Last revised: September 23, 2013

Suggested Citation

Hessick, Carissa Byrne, Ineffective Assistance at Sentencing (April 4, 2009). 50 Boston College Law Review 1069 (2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1373223

Contact Information

Carissa Byrne Hessick (Contact Author)
University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )
332 S. 1400 East Front
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 954
Downloads: 140
Download Rank: 120,249
Footnotes:  256

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.203 seconds