Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1373365
 
 

Footnotes (357)



 


 



Interpreting the 1997 Amendment to the IDEA: Did Congress Intend to Limit the Remedy of Private School Tuition Reimbursement for Disabled Children?


Emily Rosenblum


affiliation not provided to SSRN

April 1, 2009

Fordham Law Review, Vol. 77, 2009

Abstract:     
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires school districts to fund private school placements for disabled children who cannot be educated appropriately in public school. This Note explores the conflict over whether private school tuition reimbursement should be available under the IDEA to parents who place their disabled children in private school without previously receiving special education from a public agency. The conflict hinges on whether a 1997 amendment to the IDEA foreclosed the equitable considerations previously utilized by the courts to determine whether tuition reimbursement was appropriate and limited the remedy to cases where the child previously received public special education services. This Note argues that the 1997 amendment to the IDEA did not limit the remedy of tuition reimbursement. It suggests that the U.S. Supreme Court uphold the remedy of tuition reimbursement when appropriate, whether or not the disabled child previously received public special education services, when it decides the issue later this Term.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Keywords: special education, IDEA, tuition reimbursement, private school

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 6, 2009 ; Last revised: April 21, 2009

Suggested Citation

Rosenblum, Emily, Interpreting the 1997 Amendment to the IDEA: Did Congress Intend to Limit the Remedy of Private School Tuition Reimbursement for Disabled Children? (April 1, 2009). Fordham Law Review, Vol. 77, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1373365

Contact Information

Emily Rosenblum (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 441
Downloads: 47
Footnotes:  357

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.312 seconds