|
||||
|
||||
The Hidden 'Judiciary': An Empirical Examination of Executive Branch JusticeChris GuthrieVanderbilt University - Law School Jeffrey J. RachlinskiCornell Law School Andrew J. WistrichIndependent April 7, 2009 Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 09-12 Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 09-09 Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-010 Abstract: Administrative law judges attract little scholarly attention, yet they decide a large fraction of all civil disputes. In this Article, we demonstrate that these executive branch judges, like their counterparts in the judicial branch, tend to make predominantly intuitive rather than predominantly deliberative decisions. This finding sheds new light on executive branch justice by suggesting that judicial intuition, not judicial independence, is the most significant challenge facing these important judicial officers.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 56 Keywords: Judges, ALI, Decision-making, Intuition, Deliberation, Heuristic and biases working papers seriesDate posted: April 8, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.641 seconds