Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1374490
 


 



Commercial Speech, 'Irrational' Clients, and the Persistence of Bans on Subjective Lawyer Advertising


Nat Stern


Florida State University - College of Law

April 1, 2009

Brigham Young University Law Review, Forthcoming
FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 364

Abstract:     
Notwithstanding a string of defeats in the United States Supreme Court, the organized legal profession has hardly relented in its efforts to limit lawyer advertising. Among the most dubious restrictions to which many states have clung is the prohibition on "self-laudatory" claims or other subjective representations by attorneys. This Article argues that a categorical ban on such claims rests on premises at odds with the Court's commercial speech jurisprudence. In particular, the prohibition clashes with the Court's disapproval of sweeping restrictions rooted in paternalistic assumptions about the public's capacity to assess commercial advertising. Admittedly, the Court has indicated some latitude for states to curb representations about legal services that are not susceptible to objective verification. Given the broader foundations of commercial speech doctrine, however, these pronouncements cannot be taken to support wholesale suppression of attorney advertising that exceeds the narrow presentation of data. On the contrary, ambiguities in the application of commercial speech principles to such provisions should be resolved in favor of the doctrine's fundamental impulse in favor of expression. Part I provides an overview of the Court's commercial speech doctrine, including discrete treatment of cases involving lawyer advertising and solicitation. Part II sets forth central tenets underpinning the Court's approach to commercial speech. Part III examines the tension between these principles and categorically forbidding self-laudatory and other subjective attorney advertising.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 8, 2009 ; Last revised: May 20, 2009

Suggested Citation

Stern, Nat, Commercial Speech, 'Irrational' Clients, and the Persistence of Bans on Subjective Lawyer Advertising (April 1, 2009). Brigham Young University Law Review, Forthcoming; FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 364. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1374490

Contact Information

Nat S. Stern (Contact Author)
Florida State University - College of Law ( email )
425 W. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32306
United States
850-644-1801 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 659
Downloads: 64
Download Rank: 205,248

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds