Abstract

Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Chicago, Post-Chicago, and Neo-Chicago

Daniel A. Crane
University of Michigan Law School

University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 76, 2009
Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 259

Abstract:
This essay reviews Bob Pitofsky's 2008 essay compilation, How Chicago Overshot the Mark: The Effect of Conservative Economic Analysis on U.S. Antitrust. The essay critically evaluates the book's rough handling of the Chicago School and suggests a path forward for a Neo-Chicago approach to antitrust analysis.

Keywords: antitrust, antitrust theory, empiricism, free markets, free riders, merger policy

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: April 09, 2009 ; Last revised: April 09, 2009

Suggested Citation

Crane, Daniel A., Chicago, Post-Chicago, and Neo-Chicago (April 8, 2009). University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 76, 2009; Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 259. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1375026

Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Daniel A. Crane (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
734-615-2622 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)

Paper statistics

Abstract Views: 546
Downloads: 247
Download Rank: 34,120

People who downloaded
this paper also downloaded:

1. Overshot the Mark? A Simple Explanation of the Chicago School's Influence on Antitrust
By Joshua Wright

2. The Law and Economics of Monopolization Standards
By Keith Hylton

3. Rethinking Antitrust Law in an Age of Network Industries
By George Priest

More >