Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1375106
 
 

Footnotes (122)



 


 



'Sufficient' Capacity: The Contrasting Capacity Requirements for Different Documents


Lawrence A. Frolik


University of Pittsburgh - School of Law

Mary F. Radford


Georgia State University - College of Law


NAELA Journal, Vol. 2, p. 303, 2006
U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper Series
Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper Series

Abstract:     
In Anglo-American law, the concept of mental "capacity" is used to measure the degree to which an individual has the "mental ability to understand the nature and effects of one's acts" as determined by a medical or cognitive assessment of an individual's mental ability. Based on an individual's mental capacity, the law decides whether the individual had sufficient capacity to engage in the action in question. The legal concept of mental capacity, therefore, is the basis for "when a state legitimately may take action to limit an individual's rights to make decisions about his or her own person or property." Different actions require different levels of mental capacity.

The more complex the act or decision, the greater the level of capacity required; the requisite level of capacity varies with the situation. The required degree of legal capacity can be thought of as existing on a spectrum so that the legal capacity sufficient to perform certain acts may be considered insufficient to perform others. For example, the legal capacity required to make a will ("testamentary capacity") is lower than that required to enter into a valid contract. Consequently, in many jurisdictions, even though an individual has been found to lack the capacity to contract, the individual may still be found to have the requisite capacity to make a valid will.

This article discusses the levels of capacity required to undertake a variety of legal acts, including executing valid wills, trusts, gifts, powers of attorney and contracts. This article also explores a doctrine that is closely related to the determination of testamentary capacity, the doctrine of "undue influence." Undue influence lies in the shadow land between testamentary capacity and the capacity to contract and is used by probate courts to invalidate the will of an individual whose capacity level is high enough for testamentary capacity, but too low to enable the testator to resist the importuning of another.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: sufficient capacity, mental capacity, competency, doctrine of undue influence, legal capacity, testamentary capacity, contractual capacity, wills, trusts, gifts, powers of attorney, autonomy, probate law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 9, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Frolik, Lawrence A. and Radford, Mary F., 'Sufficient' Capacity: The Contrasting Capacity Requirements for Different Documents. NAELA Journal, Vol. 2, p. 303, 2006; U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper Series; Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper Series. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1375106

Contact Information

Lawrence A. Frolik (Contact Author)
University of Pittsburgh - School of Law ( email )
3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States
412-648-1363 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.pitt.edu/faculty/profiles/frolikla

Mary F. Radford
Georgia State University - College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 4037
Atlanta, GA 30302-4037
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,612
Downloads: 259
Download Rank: 64,508
Footnotes:  122

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.719 seconds