Setting the Record Straight: A Sur-Reply to Professors Lawless et al
Rafael I. Pardo
Emory University School of Law
April 9, 2009
Seattle University Law Review, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2009
I have recently engaged in a scholarly exchange with Professors Robert M. Lawless, Angela K. Littwin, Katherine M. Porter, John A. E. Pottow, Deborah K. Thorne, and Elizabeth Warren that debates the conclusions they have drawn in their first report from the 2007 Consumer Bankruptcy Project (the "First Report"). Unfortunately, the reply of Professors Lawless et al. to my critique mischaracterizes, misinterprets, and does not fully engage with the constructive commentary that I suggested. This sur-reply clarifies the misperceptions and mischaracterizations of my commentary by Professors Lawless et al. and demonstrates that my arguments not only are grounded in a compelling theory of the operation of the bankruptcy system and an understanding of the First Report's data, but also offer useful ideas for exploring available empirical data.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 11
Keywords: 2007 Consumer Bankruptcy Project, bankruptcy reform, consumer debtors, means testAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 10, 2009 ; Last revised: August 1, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.422 seconds