Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1377522
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (259)



 


 



An Empirical Analysis of Supreme Court Certiorari Petition Procedures: The Call for Response and the Call for the Views of the Solicitor General


David C. Thompson


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Melanie Wachtell


affiliation not provided to SSRN

April, 13 2009

George Mason Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2009

Abstract:     
The Supreme Court frequently uses two tools to gather information about which cases to hear following a petition for writ of certiorari: the call for response and the call for the views of the Solicitor General. To date, there has been no empirical analysis of how the Supreme Court deploys these tools and little qualitative study. This Article fills in basic gaps in the literature by providing concrete answers to common questions regarding these two tools and offers detailed analysis of how and why states, private parties, and the United States (through the Solicitor General) respond to petitions. In addition, the Article provides much-needed data for litigators and litigants to be able to estimate the probability of their case being heard by the Court, and provides insight on how to react when the Court calls for a response or calls for the views of the Solicitor General. To reach these conclusions, the Article relies on detailed, quantitative analysis of a novel, 30,000-petition dataset, as well as interviews with top Supreme Court litigators, former Supreme Court clerks, and former staff of the Clerk’s office.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 66

Keywords: Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court, certiorari, call for a response, call for the views of the Solicitor General, CFR, CVSG, empirical, data analysis, supreme court practice, supreme court litigation, call for response

JEL Classification: K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 14, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Thompson, David C. and Wachtell, Melanie, An Empirical Analysis of Supreme Court Certiorari Petition Procedures: The Call for Response and the Call for the Views of the Solicitor General (April, 13 2009). George Mason Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1377522

Contact Information

David C. Thompson (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Melanie Wachtell
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,984
Downloads: 1,065
Download Rank: 9,647
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  259

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.390 seconds