SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (108)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

The Top Twenty Things to Change in or around Australia's International Arbitration Act

Luke R. Nottage
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law; University of Sydney - Australian Network for Japanese Law

Richard Garnett
University of Melbourne - Law School



Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 09/19
U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 405

Abstract:     
In November 2008 Australia's Attorney-General's Department (AGD) initiated a Review of its International Arbitration Act (IAA), last substantially revised two decades ago by adopting the 1985 UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (ICA). This aims to claw back ground lost to arbitral venues in the Asia-Pacific, which also implies a clearer framework for enforcing foreign awards. A long-term goal may be to revive domestic arbitration in Australia, which has been languishing.

The AGD's Discussion Paper invited Submissions from the public on eight issues in particular. These include whether and how the IAA should incorporate various 2006 amendments to the Model Law, including relaxed writing requirements for arbitration agreements and broader scope for arbitrators to issue interim measures. We urge even more ambitious reform, covering the following "Top Twenty" issues (and numerous other sub-issues) under four headings. Guiding principles should be for the revised IAA to adopt more informal or expeditious solutions, and more global approaches. This is crucial to address the considerable statistical and anecdotal evidence of re-emergent costs and delays in ICA in Australia and world-wide.

Stays
1. Arbitrability - scope and applicable law
2. Arbitration agreement - substantive validity and applicable law
3. Conditions on stays
4. Stays under s 7 vs ML Art 8 - alternatives and time limits
5. Arbitration agreement - formal validity and writing requirements
Enforcing Awards
6. Two issues when Australia implemented NYC Art V
7. Enforcement possible only under IAA s 8
8. Enforcing awards set aside at seat
9. Suspending enforcement if setting aside sought at seat
10. Public policy
11. Interim measures
Model Law
12. Opt-out and opt-in
13. Jurisdiction of courts and devolving powers to arbitral institutions
14. Arbitrators ruling on own Jurisdiction
15. Evidence
16. Arb-Med
17. Awards - copies and reasons
18. Other optional provisions - interest, costs and consolidation
Overarching Issues
19. Confidentiality and privacy
20. Overarching principles

Keywords: commercial arbitration, international dispute resolution, mediation, international law, Australian law, comparative law, consumer law, law reform

JEL Classifications: K10, K22, K30, K33

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: April 16, 2009 ; Last revised: June 15, 2009

Suggested Citation

Nottage, Luke R. and Garnett, Richard, The Top Twenty Things to Change in or around Australia's International Arbitration Act (April 13, 2009). Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 09/19; U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 405. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1378722


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Luke R. Nottage (Contact Author)
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law ( email )
Faculty of Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia
University of Sydney - Australian Network for Japanese Law
Room 640, Building F10, Eastern Avenue
Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
Richard Garnett
University of Melbourne - Law School ( email )
Victoria 3010 Australia
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 461
Downloads: 110
Download Rank: 73,318
Footnotes: 108

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.109 seconds.