Why Defense Attorneys Cannot, But Do, Care About Innocence
Robert P. Mosteller
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law
Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 50, 2009
UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1381003
At a time of special concern for the innocence, this article reexamines the apparent anomaly that trial-level defense attorneys claim they care neither about guilt nor innocence. Innocence currently fuels procedural reforms benefitting criminal defendants, but that effect could change, and innocence might become a wedge issue dividing progressives if reforms promise targeted protection for the innocent. Defense counsel attitudes about the irrelevance of innocence seem to invite such division. I explain why excellent counsel for all, not just the apparently innocent, should be strongly supported by innocence advocates.
Defense counsel institutionally cannot allow apparent guilt to affect their zealous representation. Although special treatment for those perceived innocent could likewise devolve into second-class representation for many, the problem with special care for the apparently innocent is less institutional than practical. Virtually all those charged with serious crimes assert innocence to their attorneys, who possess no reliable way to determine truth in seriously contested cases. Nevertheless, defense attorneys actually do react differently when they believe they have encountered innocence. The hard-boiled defense attorney's unconcern with innocence is largely necessary but not fully accurate.
I find no "magic bullet" to allow defense attorneys to focus on the likely innocent, only tolerable compromises. Those committed to protecting the innocence should vigorously support adequate resources for defenders who represent the unsorted mass of criminal defendants. Such defenders provide the best hope for many innocent defendants who, lacking clear proof of innocence, are hidden among the guilty.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 78Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 15, 2009 ; Last revised: December 18, 2009
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.281 seconds