|
||||
|
||||
A Research Based Perspective on SEC’s Proposed Rule on ROADMAP FOR Potential Use of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance With International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by U.S. Issuers
Karim Jamal University of Alberta - Department of Accounting & Management Information Systems Robert H. Colson Grant Thornton LLP Robert J. Bloomfield Cornell University - Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management Theodore E. Christensen Brigham Young University - Marriott School of Management Stephen R. Moehrle University of Missouri at St. Louis - Accounting Area James A. Ohlson affiliation not provided to SSRN Stephen H. Penman Columbia University - Department of Accounting Gary Previts Case Western Reserve University - Department of Accountancy Thomas L. Stober University of Notre Dame - Department of Accountancy Shyam Sunder Yale School of Management Ross L. Watts Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management April 14, 2009 Johnson School Research Paper Series No. #21-09 Abstract: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a call for comment on a proposal to adopt a Roadmap for potential use of international financial reporting standards (IFRS) by U.S. Companies. We comment on five key issues raised by the SEC proposal. First, we propose that the need for a global regulator is overstated. A global regulator is unlikely to help achieve the stated goals of comparability and consistency of financial reporting on a global basis. We favor allowing U.S. companies to choose use of U.S. GAAP or IFRS rather than mandating one global monopoly set of standards. Second, we agree that the focus on auditing is a very relevant issue that deserves more attention from standard setters. Gains from adopting principles based accounting standards such as IFRS are likely to be realized only if auditors are also principles based. Third, while we have serious concerns about governance and financing mechanisms of IASB, we recommend that all regulatory actions cannot be held to a standstill while structural changes are made to the IASB. Fourth, we are not in favor of requiring reconciliation schedules from U.S. companies using IFRS. We view such reconciliations as being costly and unnecessary. Fifth, we recommend that the SEC pay more explicit attention to the educational and professional judgment consequences of its proposals. This comment was developed by the Financial Accounting Standards Committee of the American Accounting Association and does not represent an official position of the American Accounting Association.
Keywords: U.S. GAAP, IFRS, SEC, Reconciliation, Roadmap JEL Classifications: M41, M44, M47, G38 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: April 16, 2009 ; Last revised: June 04, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.188 seconds.