Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1386937
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (38)



 


 



The Individual Realism of Aristotle


Liesbeth Huppes-Cluysenaer


Amsterdam University College

April 16, 2009

Revista da Faculdade de Direito de Conselheiro Lafaiete, Nova Fase, Vol. 3, pp. 65-82, 2007

Abstract:     
This article compares Aristotelian and Christian ontology and sets out a new ‘de-christianised’ perspective on Aristotle’s realism. The difference between the realism of Aristotle and Christianity is a difference between individual and general realism.

The individual realism of Aristotle elucidates why Greek thinking on mathematics, logic and natural science did not lead to further development of the natural sciences and why the detour by way of Christian metaphysics was necessary for further growth of these sciences. On the other hand, the individual realism of Aristotle led to the development of an exquisite theory of action, viz. Roman Law. In this respect it fits the renewed attention to the contextuality of action.

The influence of individual realism on civil law as it still exists today is examined mainly with reference to its relevance for the concepts of the subject, the formality of law and the case method.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: epistemology, ontology, Aristotle, metaphysics, realism, civil law, formal law

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 16, 2009 ; Last revised: April 8, 2011

Suggested Citation

Huppes-Cluysenaer, Liesbeth, The Individual Realism of Aristotle (April 16, 2009). Revista da Faculdade de Direito de Conselheiro Lafaiete, Nova Fase, Vol. 3, pp. 65-82, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1386937 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1386937

Contact Information

Liesbeth Huppes-Cluysenaer (Contact Author)
Amsterdam University College ( email )
Amsterdam, 1000 BA
Netherlands
+31(0)20 5253565 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 800
Downloads: 65
Download Rank: 211,800
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  38
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds