Litigating Secrets: Comparative Perspectives on the State Secrets Privilege

60 Pages Posted: 17 Apr 2009 Last revised: 28 Dec 2011

See all articles by Sudha Setty

Sudha Setty

City University of New York (CUNY) Law School

Date Written: 2009

Abstract

The Article considers the history and use of the state secrets privilege in the United States and the ongoing congressional efforts to reform the use of the privilege. Although numerous articles have addressed the application of the state secrets privilege in the United States, this Article breaks new ground by examining the history and use of the privilege in other nations which confront serious national security threats. This Article considers the modern application the privilege in Scotland, England, Israel and India - an analysis which contextualizes both the current use of the U.S. privilege and the efforts at legislative reform. Such comparative analysis is necessary to fully understand the transnational implications of the U.S. application of the state secrets privilege, which have recently come to light in litigation involving both the United States and England.

This Article concludes that domestic reform efforts continue to be necessary to achieve an appropriate application of the privilege which balances national security with the need to preserve the rule of law, individual rights, liberty interests and government accountability. The Article further suggests that reforms should explicitly account for alleged human rights abuses by the government in determining whether a claim of privilege should be upheld.

Keywords: state secrets, executive power, justiciability, comparative law, human rights

Suggested Citation

Setty, Sudha, Litigating Secrets: Comparative Perspectives on the State Secrets Privilege (2009). Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 201, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1387085

Sudha Setty (Contact Author)

City University of New York (CUNY) Law School ( email )

2 Court Square
Long Island City, NY 11101
United States

HOME PAGE: http://law.cuny.edu

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
350
Abstract Views
2,172
Rank
156,083
PlumX Metrics