The Overcharge as a Measure for Antitrust Damages
Martijn A. Han
Humboldt University of Berlin
Maarten Pieter Schinkel
University of Amsterdam - Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics (ACLE); Tinbergen Institute - Tinbergen Institute Amsterdam (TIA)
University of Amsterdam - Department of Quantitative Economics (KE); Tinbergen Institute
August 12, 2009
Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2008-08
Victims of antitrust violations can recover damages in court. Yet, the quantification of antitrust damages and to whom they accrue is often complex. An illegal price increase somewhere in the chain of production percolates through to the other layers in a ripple of partial pass-ons. The resulting reductions in sales and input demands lead to additional harm to both downstream (in)direct purchasers and upstream suppliers. Nevertheless, U.S. civil antitrust litigation is almost exclusively concerned with direct purchaser claims for (treble) damages calculated on the basis of the overcharge. Similar best practice rules are emerging in Europe. In this paper, we show that there is no structural relationship between the direct purchaser overcharge and the true harm inflicted by an antitrust violation on all of the direct and indirect purchasers and sellers in the chain of production.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 35
Keywords: Antitrust, damages, pass-on, overcharge
JEL Classification: C13, D43, L41
Date posted: April 16, 2009 ; Last revised: March 30, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.266 seconds