Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=139233
 
 

Citations



 


 



Ascertaining the Laws of the Several States: Positivism and Judicial Federalism After Erie


Bradford R. Clark


George Washington University Law School


University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 145, No. 6, 1997

Abstract:     
This article addresses the problem that federal courts face when they are asked to adjudicate cases presenting novel or unsettled questions of state law. The article suggests that the Supreme Court's decision in Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins rests on constitutional principles of judicial federalism, and was facilitated by the Court's application of legal positivism to state judge-made law. The article goes on to evaluate several competing methods for ascertaining state law, including prediction, abstention, the static approach, and certification. The article concludes that certification best implements the principles of judicial federalism underlying Erie, and thus counsels federal courts to employ a presumption in favor of certification.

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: November 10, 1998  

Suggested Citation

Clark, Bradford R., Ascertaining the Laws of the Several States: Positivism and Judicial Federalism After Erie. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 145, No. 6, 1997. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=139233

Contact Information

Bradford R. Clark (Contact Author)
George Washington University Law School ( email )
2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202-994-2073 (Phone)
202-994-9446 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 485

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds