Gene R. Nichol Jr.
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law
Michigan Law Review, Vol. 107, No. 6, 2009
UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1392447
This essay explores, modestly criticizes, but principally applauds Martha Nussbaum’s strong linkage of establishment and free exercise jurisprudence with the demands of human equality. Her wide-ranging study of the religion clauses touches something at the core of American citizenship. No bosses. No masters. No insiders. No outcasts. More idiosyncratically, I also explore and expand on Nussbaum’s thesis in light of a modestly serious and rather public dispute over religious equality that occurred at the College of William and Mary during my presidency there. A disagreement over the display of religious symbols in a public university, to my surprise, echoed more in traditional claims of equality and privilege than I would have assumed. I am candid in claiming that my own experiences suggest, perhaps unfortunately, that Nussbaum is rather acutely on to something when it comes to the central meaning of the protection of religious liberty in a diverse and democratic culture. A respect for the equal status of dissenters animates the religion clauses and highlights the crucial nature of their implementation.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 23, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.422 seconds