Has Corporate Law Failed? Addressing Proposals for Reform
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law
April 21, 2009
Michigan Law Review, Vol. 107, 2009
Successful corporations create extraordinary wealth. The longstanding question is how this wealth should be distributed. The conventional answer has been shareholder primacy. Most stakeholders, such as customers, suppliers, creditors, and employees, must negotiate their portion ex ante, but everything left over, the residual interest, belongs to the corporation’s shareholders. The progressive answer is that wealth should be distributed fairly to all stakeholders, and that corporations have a social responsibility that goes beyond the mere maximization of shareholder wealth. This essay reviews Kent Greenfield's book, The Failure of Corporate Law: Fundamental Flaws and Progressive Possibilities, that develops and extends the arguments for a broader stakeholder approach.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20
Keywords: corporate governance, progressive corporate law, corporate social responsibility
JEL Classification: K22Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 14, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.453 seconds