Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1392628
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (98)



 


 



Has Corporate Law Failed? Addressing Proposals for Reform


Antony Page


Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law

April 21, 2009

Michigan Law Review, Vol. 107, 2009

Abstract:     
Successful corporations create extraordinary wealth. The longstanding question is how this wealth should be distributed. The conventional answer has been shareholder primacy. Most stakeholders, such as customers, suppliers, creditors, and employees, must negotiate their portion ex ante, but everything left over, the residual interest, belongs to the corporation’s shareholders. The progressive answer is that wealth should be distributed fairly to all stakeholders, and that corporations have a social responsibility that goes beyond the mere maximization of shareholder wealth. This essay reviews Kent Greenfield's book, The Failure of Corporate Law: Fundamental Flaws and Progressive Possibilities, that develops and extends the arguments for a broader stakeholder approach.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: corporate governance, progressive corporate law, corporate social responsibility

JEL Classification: K22

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 14, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Page, Antony, Has Corporate Law Failed? Addressing Proposals for Reform (April 21, 2009). Michigan Law Review, Vol. 107, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1392628

Contact Information

Antony Page (Contact Author)
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law ( email )
530 West New York Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
United States
317.278.9037 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 927
Downloads: 238
Download Rank: 72,569
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  98

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.266 seconds