Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1394436
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (76)



 


 



The Boldt Decision in Canada: Aboriginal Treaty Rights to Fish on the Pacific


Douglas C. Harris


University of British Columbia - Faculty of Law

2008

THE POWER OF PROMISES: RETHINKING INDIAN TREATIES IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST, Alexandra Harmon, ed., University of Washington Press, 2008

Abstract:     
The Oregon Boundary Treaty of 1846 established the forty-ninth parallel as the boundary between British and American interests in western North America. After 1846, Aboriginal peoples to the north of the border negotiated with the British Crown the terms of their coexistence with incoming settlers, those to its south with the United States. As a result, while some of the Coast Salish and Kwak’waka’wakw peoples in what would become British Columbia concluded treaties between 1850 and 1854 with the Crown’s representative, James Douglas, the tribes in the United States settled with the governor of the Washington territory, Isaac I. Stevens, in 1854 and 1855.

The Douglas and Stevens treaties, as the agreements came to be know, included monetary payment and guarantees of reserved land, hunting rights, and fishing rights. The fisheries provisions were short. The Douglas treaties reserved to Aboriginal peoples the right to “their fisheries as formerly”; the Stevens treaties provided that “the right of taking fish at usual and accustomed grounds and stations is further secured to said Indians in common with all citizens of the Territory.”

This essay focuses on the relationship between U.S. and Canadian judicial interpretations of these treaty rights to fish. In particular, it explores the impact of two U.S. decisions – United States v. Washington ("the Boldt decision") and Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Association – on the general development of Aboriginal and treaty rights in Canada. Although not widely cited in Canadian courts, the decisions have had a profound influence on Canadian Aboriginal law. In addition, this essay considers the historical evidence pertaining to the fishing rights in the Douglas treaties and suggests various interpretations. In doing so, it turns back to the U.S. decisions to consider whether they provide useful guidance for the interpretation of the fishing rights provision in the Douglas treaties.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: Aboriginal law, Legal history, Fisheries law

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 25, 2009 ; Last revised: July 17, 2014

Suggested Citation

Harris, Douglas C., The Boldt Decision in Canada: Aboriginal Treaty Rights to Fish on the Pacific (2008). THE POWER OF PROMISES: RETHINKING INDIAN TREATIES IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST, Alexandra Harmon, ed., University of Washington Press, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1394436

Contact Information

Douglas C. Harris (Contact Author)
University of British Columbia - Faculty of Law ( email )
1822 East Mall
Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1
Canada
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,521
Downloads: 217
Download Rank: 83,226
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  76

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds