|
||||
|
||||
Twombly is the Logical Extension of the Mathews v. Eldridge Test to DiscoveryAndrew Blair-StanekUniversity of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law Jan 1, 2010 Florida Law Review, Vol. 62, January 2010 Abstract: The Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly has baffled and mystified both practitioners and scholars, casting aside the well-settled rule for evaluating motions to dismiss in favor of an amorphous “plausibility” standard. This Article argues that Twombly was not revolutionary but simply part of the Court’s ever-expanding application of the familiar three-factor Mathews v. Eldridge test. Misused discovery can deprive litigants of property and liberty interests, and in some cases Mathews requires the safeguard of dismissing the complaint. This Article’s insight explains Twombly’s origins and structure, while also suggesting a source for lower courts to draw on in developing post-Twombly jurisprudence.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 46 Keywords: Twombly, Mathews v. Eldridge, discovery, pleading, procedural due process Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 28, 2009 ; Last revised: February 8, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.328 seconds