Two to Tango, One in Limbo: A Comparative Analysis of Fathers’ Rights in Infant Adoptions
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law
April 29, 2009
Duquesne Law Review, Vol. 47, pp. 89-114, 2009
Many American and English courts today permit infant adoptions without notifying or seeking the consent of biological fathers. However, children’s best interests would be better served by recognizing their father-child relationship, instead of institutionally denying it. Any legal approach that ignores the biological father devalues the importance of a child’s placement in the paternal family unit, the significance of the medical history on the father’s side, the emotional link between a father and his child, and the father’s legal right to his own child. This comparative law Article therefore argues, using the American and English legal systems as illustrative examples, that both the father and the child should have their father-child relationship protected, which must be properly severed and waived by informed consent before a child is placed for adoption.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26
Keywords: family law, comparative law, comparative family law, adoption, English law, Fourteenth Amendment, fathers' rights, children's best interestsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 29, 2009 ; Last revised: June 5, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.656 seconds