Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1397107
 
 

Footnotes (29)



 


 



Backwards and Forwards with Tort Law


John Gardner


University of Oxford - Faculty of Law

January 1, 2005

LAW AND SOCIAL JUSTICE, J. Keim-Campbell, M. O'Rourke & D. Shier, eds., MIT Press, 2005

Abstract:     
Here I am concerned with Jules Coleman's challenge, in his book The Practice of Principle, to the attempts of some economists of law to defend, in economic terms, certain core doctrines of the law of torts. The core doctrines in question are (a) that a tort is a wrong and (b) that the remedial duties of tort law (especially to pay damages) are duties to repair the wrong (or the damage that forms part of it). Although I share the view that economists of law typically work with a bad theory of value, I doubt Coleman's contention that their bad theory of value disables them from defending these doctrines in terms of it. Along the way I doubt the contrasts that are sometimes drawn between 'justificatory' and 'explanatory' theories of tort, and between 'normative' and 'positive' economics.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: jurisprudence, tort law

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 30, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Gardner, John, Backwards and Forwards with Tort Law (January 1, 2005). LAW AND SOCIAL JUSTICE, J. Keim-Campbell, M. O'Rourke & D. Shier, eds., MIT Press, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1397107

Contact Information

John Gardner (Contact Author)
University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )
St. Cross Building
St. Cross Road
Oxford, OX1 3UJ
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,565
Downloads: 375
Download Rank: 44,375
Footnotes:  29

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.297 seconds